To start, I don't know Pomeroy's system of creating "similarity scores." That's fine. I'd rather just list important stats for both players to get a more accurate picture of what each player brought to the table. We'll start with his freshman year.
|Player||3P %||2P %||eFG%||FT%||TO%||FT Rate||Ast%||Stl%||PPG||ORating||%TMPoss|
|Player B||31.4%||40.7%||43.0%||78.4%||33.0%||50.3%||26.1%||2.7%||9.2||92.6||17.2% |
One quick word on the stats chosen. I originally also looked at offensive and defensive rebounding rates, and block rates, but I don't find either very illustrative. Both players had insignificant block rates and rather low rebounding rates. It's hardly important. I also want to point out that "PPG" is not points scored per game, but points produced per game, which is a different calculation involving an estimate of how many points this player individually created/produced for the team. It takes into account, for instance, assists (as are most important for this comparison). It also takes into account total team points scored, which can vary from team to team based on tempo and overall offensive efficiency.
At any rate, it's very plain to see that these two players had shockingly similar freshman seasons at Duke. They shot a nearly identical eFG%, predicated by one's ability to shoot a bit better inside the arc and the other's ability to shoot 3s slightly better. They shot a nearly identical percentage from the line. They both had tremendous turnover problems. Player A got to the line a little more often, but nothing incredibly significant. They had nearly an identical rate of stealing the ball. However, Player A assisted many more baskets while on the court, and not shockingly had a higher points produced per game, even though both players operated at about the same individual offensive efficiency. Player A also used more possessions - another contribution to his greater points produced.
Player A probably had a better season, but the difference is not compelling. Now we move on to the second year.
Both players have improved dramatically, but still remain pretty similar. It's now evident that Player B has improved his shot a great deal and outshoots Player A convincingly. Again they have very similar FT percentages and turnover rates - though both improved. It seems Player A remains able to get to the line more often than B, though both saw their free throw rate drop noticeably. Both suffered a dip in their assist rates (1.5% for Player A, and 2.6% for Player B). Again they have very similar steal rates (though both saw it drop from their freshman numbers). At any rate, at the end of the day, they produce about the same points per game yet again (the difference mainly in the assist disparity). Both improved their offensive efficiency - and significantly, Player B did so while also increasing his individual importance in the offense. As a freshman, he only used 17.2%, but as a sophomore he increased that number to 21%. As a side note, it is more rare to see a player both improve his efficiency and improve his usage - it reflects a great deal of improvement. As Pomeroy notes here, a player with a usage of about 17.1% his freshman year will most likely end up with a usage of about 18.2%. Player B here increased his to 21%, which is somewhere in the 80-90th percentile I would imagine. A substantial improvement.
Well by this point, it's probably no surprise who these players are. Player A is none other than NCAA All-Time leading assist man, and starting point guard for back-to-back national champions, Bobby Hurley. And Player B, of course, is none other than perhaps the single most criticized and maligned Duke point guard in the K era, Greg Paulus.
Seeing as how the two players followed a pretty similar course of improvement over their first two years, I think it's at least moderately illustrative to look at Bobby Hurley's Junior campaign as, perhaps, a preview of things to come.
As can plainly be seen, after his sophomore year, Hurley saw another year of improvement across the board. He shot better from the field, he turned the ball over less often, had a higher assist rate than he ever had (after having a slightly down year his sophomore year), produced more points, and at a higher efficiency, while carrying a larger offensive burden. Hurley is absolutely beloved by Duke fans - considered by many of them as the greatest point guard in NCAA history, and at any rate the greatest point guard in Duke history. I think what this demonstrates is in that any accurate and demonstrable way, Paulus and Hurley had at least similar freshman and sophomore years, and both improved nearly across the board in every major stat associated with their position. I suppose that's the difference between Hurley having Grant Hill and Christian Laettner and Greg Paulus having... who exactly in 06-07?
I can also use this time to dispel some myth that Bobby Hurley was a tremendous defender and Paulus is an atrocious defender. They had an identical rate of stealing the ball their first year (and Paulus actually had a higher defensive rebounding rate both years for whatever that's worth - by about 2%) and Paulus actually had a higher rate his second year. Hurley was chiefly an offensive player in nature, which worked just fine considering how absolutely good his teams were offensively (the 1991-92 team is one of 3 Duke teams to crack an efficiency of 1.2 points per possession). What is sometimes overlooked is that the 1991-92 Duke team is (shockingly) the third worst defensive team in terms of raw efficiency that Duke has fielded in the last 20 years, giving up .9987 points per possession (most Duke teams give up somewhere between .9 and .95, and the awful 95 and 96 teams gave up 1.06 and 1.02 respectively). If anything, Paulus is probably a better defender than Hurley was. And he did it with a broken bone in his foot that needed to be removed. As an aside, do people still believe that defense wins championships? After Florida's mediocre defense in the tournament last year, I hope that myth has been dispelled. The 34-2 Duke squad in 92 is pretty persuasive evidence against that myth too.
Ultimately my point isn't that Greg Paulus is as good as Bobby Hurley. That argument would never fly with anyone - where are Paulus' rings? Where are his endless accolades? I think what the comparison does show, though, is that perhaps we, as Duke fans, should be patient with Paulus. His talent is really awfully similar to Hurley's talent - and neither were in the same stratosphere as Jason (Jay) Williams who developed into a monster as a sophomore. The biggest difference is the level of talent surrounding Hurley vis-a-vis Paulus. This year, most Duke fans are expecting our team to be much improved offensively. Whether that comes true or not, I think we can very reasonably assume that Greg Paulus will have a very successful junior season offensively.